Wednesday, March 25, 2009
With the schematic design of Building A complete, we have transitioned to the design of the interpretive center (Building B). We are refining the site plan to include the interpretive center and a deeply shaded pergola. The pergola is conceived as a climate moderating outdoor element that connects the interpretive center to the fuel processing building. We have selected the southeast corner of the lot as the site of the interpretive center because it affords an excellent balance between physical, climatological, and experiential access.
Posted by ProjectX spring2009 at 12:43 AM
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Sunday, March 8, 2009
The selected design alternatives have been parametrically modeled and applied to the base case model, one on top of the other ("cascaded"), to estimate their impacts on whole building energy performance. These design features have been incorporated into the final schematic design of the Project A building.
Posted by ProjectX spring2009 at 10:00 AM
This example (Project A materials study) illustrates the way design alternatives have been modeled in eQUEST as discrete parametric runs. The results are compared to the base case in order to estimate the impact of each measure on overall building energy performance.
Posted by ProjectX spring2009 at 8:42 AM
The table lists the design alternatives that have been parametrically modeled in eQUEST as discrete modifications to the base case energy model. The results of these "discrete parametric runs" have been used to evaluate individual design alternative effectiveness with regard to their impacts on building energy performance.
Posted by ProjectX spring2009 at 8:31 AM
A major goal of this project is to explore methods that can be used to create beautiful and functional energy-efficient buildings. With this goal in mind, we have used eQUEST (DOE2) to quantify the energy performance characteristics of all design alternatives. This means that energy modeling has been used from the beginning of the design process to inform critical design decisions. ProjectX explores the integration of cutting-edge quantitative energy modeling tools into the traditional architectural design process, however the information gained from this approach is not the only factor guiding our design decisions.
Energy modeling has been used in three distinct phases as part of our design process:
1. Preliminary building Shape Study
2. Discrete parametric modeling of design alternatives
3. Cascaded parametric modeling of design alternatives
Preliminary building shape study
A beginning building form grew, in part, out of the information gained from the preliminary building shape study (see 2/15/09 and 2/20/09 posts). The building was refined and set to comply with the requirements of ASHRAE 90.1 Appendix G to form the "Base Case" eQUEST energy model.
Discrete parametric modeling
A series of design alternatives were parametrically modeled and evaluated against the base case model. These discrete parametric runs have been used to steer numerous design decisions.
Cascaded parametric modeling
A final eQUEST model has been created that is based on information gained from the discrete parametric modeling process. The design alternatives that have been selected and incorporated into the final schematic design are cascaded over the base case in order to estimate whole building performance.
Posted by ProjectX spring2009 at 8:09 AM
- Site Plan Development
- Interpretive Center (Building B) Program
- Building B
- Presentation For Mid Review
- Final Boards for Mid Review
- Cascaded carbon emissions - Project A
- Cascaded energy use by fuel type - Project A
- Cascaded Site/Source energy use - Project A
- Cascaded parametric modeling - Project A
- Discrete parametric modeling example - materials s...
- Discrete parametric modeling - Project A
- eQUEST energy modeling overview
- Page Layout in Revit
- North Elevation
- ▼ March (14)